<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DoubleClick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrave.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/doubleclick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrave.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/doubleclick/</link>
	<description>In love with the world of ICT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ym</title>
		<link>http://techrave.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/doubleclick/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>ym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techrave.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-35</guid>
		<description>As with any successful business, if it is already making mountains of profit, the next step is to diversify / expand.

And Google nailed it with DoubleClick. While the acquisition figures suggest astronomical liquidity, it also reflects how a gargantuan e-company is willing to take huge risks in subtly tightening its stranglehold on the e-market.

Forget not the risk here may be easily compared with levels seen in venture capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with any successful business, if it is already making mountains of profit, the next step is to diversify / expand.</p>
<p>And Google nailed it with DoubleClick. While the acquisition figures suggest astronomical liquidity, it also reflects how a gargantuan e-company is willing to take huge risks in subtly tightening its stranglehold on the e-market.</p>
<p>Forget not the risk here may be easily compared with levels seen in venture capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpy</title>
		<link>http://techrave.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/doubleclick/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>kpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techrave.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-32</guid>
		<description>i think the double click is a very very useful.. makes things so much easier for the users.. but i have never actually realised that the process of double click actually involves so many process.. i think it has simplified the whole getting access to information that i really want.. at least i dont have to go through a lot of unwanted websites before i actually reach what i want.but since Google is willing to pay so much for it, i guess it must be something which will really attract and retain the user&#039;s interest in using Google instead of other search engines..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the double click is a very very useful.. makes things so much easier for the users.. but i have never actually realised that the process of double click actually involves so many process.. i think it has simplified the whole getting access to information that i really want.. at least i dont have to go through a lot of unwanted websites before i actually reach what i want.but since Google is willing to pay so much for it, i guess it must be something which will really attract and retain the user&#8217;s interest in using Google instead of other search engines..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
